Give up?

Whoever you guessed I'm willing to bet it was not this little guy .

Improperly and somewhat misleadingly labeled on that YouTube post as Little Richard.  It's in fact Sugar Chile Robinson.

Frank Isacc Robinson

Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan. At an early age he showed unusual gifts singing the blues and accompanying himself on the piano.[2] According to contemporary newsreels, he was self-taught and managed to use techniques including slapping the keys with elbows and fists.[3] He won a talent show at the Paradise Theatre in Detroit at the age of three, and in 1945 played guest spots at the theatre with Lionel Hampton, who was prevented by child protection legislation from taking Robinson on tour with him. However, Robinson performed on radio with Hampton and Harry "The Hipster" Gibson, and also appeared as himself in the Hollywood film No Leave, No Love, starring Van Johnson and Keenan Wynn.[4]

In 1946, he played for President Harry S. Truman at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, shouting out "How'm I Doin', Mr. President?" - which became his catchphrase - during his performance of "Caldonia". He was the first African American performer to appear at the annual WHCA dinner. He began touring major theaters, setting box office records in Detroit and California. In 1949 he was given special permission to join the American Federation of Musicians and record his first releases on Capitol Records, "Numbers Boogie" and "Caldonia", both reaching the Billboard R&B chart. In 1950, he toured and appeared on television with Count Basie and in a short film 'Sugar Chile' Robinson, Billie Holiday, Count Basie and His Sextet. The following year, he toured the UK, appearing at the London Palladium. He stopped recording in 1952, later explaining:[1]

For all her faults(!) they take care to mention:

her pre-Sanders seemingly "obstacle-free coronation(!)"

her "ties to Wall Street"

her "support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq"

her support for "the trade policies of her husband's administration"

her "penchant for secrecy"

her "willingness to modify her positions to suit the popular mood"

her being "inauthentic" (sigh!)

her lack of "that drink-a-beer-with-me quality that voters often look for in a candidate" (They do? Or is it just a silly media-made meme?)

her being "by no means perfect"

her "voting to authorize President George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq" (one more time; for good measure, I guess.)

her email server; and although they mention that it's unlikely she'll be prosecuted, they still opine that "the fact that the FBI is investigating at all is embarrassing" (To whom exactly?)

her "stubborn(!) refusal to release the contents of speeches"

her altering "positions in light of shifting political winds"

her presently leaving out "rare" when talking about abortion being "safe, legal and rare" (Maybe 8 years on, she looks at it differently and not necessarily because of "being endorsed by Planned Parenthood"?)

her perceived(!) being "malleable has been a disadvantage"

her "candidacy might(!) seem unexciting"

And then this

[Being the first woman elected president of the United States] would be a joyous, long-awaited, landmark moment in American history after centuries of discrimination and second-class status for half the population. But the real reason ...

when they might just as well have said

Not only would it be a joyous, long-awaited, landmark moment in American history after centuries of discrimination and second-class status for half the population, but also ...

Oregon

Clinton 48
Sanders 33

Why did almost everybody fail to predict Donald Trump's victory in the Republican primaries? Nate Silver blames the news media, disorganized Republican elites, and the surprising appeal of cultural grievance. Nate Cohn lists a number of factors, from the unusually large candidate field to the friendly calendar. Jim Rutenberg thinks journalism strayed too far from good old-fashioned shoe-leather reporting. Justin Wolfers zeroes in on Condorcet's paradox.

Here's the factor I think everybody missed: The Republican Party turns out to be filled with idiots.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has now told field offices nationwide to launch a 30-day "surge" of arrests focused on mothers and children who have already been told to leave the United States, the document seen by Reuters said. The operation would also cover minors who have entered the country without a guardian and since turned 18 years of age, the document said. Two sources confirmed the details of the plan.

Rynazewski hit his mother in the back with the ax, knocking her to the ground. Baldwin and Hall opened fire, hitting Rynazewski and causing him to drop the ax as he fell to the ground, Garcia said.

The suspect tried to pick up the ax, prompting one of the officers to fire a stun gun at him, Garcia said. But that didn't stop him. He managed to get hold of the ax again and swung it, striking his mother in the head, Garcia said.

The officers fired their guns again and Rynazewski dropped the ax. He was taken into custody with multiple gunshot wounds, authorities said.

Hard to tell from just one article, but it sounds like the decision to use a stun gun allowed this woman to be struck again.  Were these cops afraid lawsuits, losing their jobs if they fired several real bullets until the threat was contained?

Cable definitely has some upsides.

 The petitioners claimed that filling out the form or sending in a government form letter indicating their objections to covering birth control "was a burden on their faith."

  Because, it set in motion the process by which their employees received coverage from their insurers, although coverage was not paid for as a part of their insurance.  The preponderance (just one in favor) of the lower courts rejected the challenges.

The decision of the Court is being described as a "punt".  However, an aerial view of the ruling seems to be a win for the government in that the directive to the lower courts is to "encourage contraceptive coverage seamlessly," and Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg prevailed against those male justices who were attempting to craft simplistic and unworkable alternatives to the government's work around (a stand alone contraceptive policy, that did not exist and would undermine the intentions of comprehensive women's health care).

 When asked, would you support or oppose Georgia lawmakers attempting to pass the "religious liberty" bill again, 40% support, 51% oppose, 9% don't know/no answer. (55% of Democrats supported Deal's veto; 58% of Republicans opposed the veto).